politics. If it wasn't for the idea of power, which by definition could mean "ability to
act or produce an effect" or political control or influence", the systems of the
government, economy, politics, etc. would run off individual units rather than one
established group, or authority. For example, the group that holds power is group one
where the group that follows is group two. Group one can accomplish more by
providing initiative for others to act. Others as in, indecisive or softer temperamental
minded people who are considered followers. This would be group two. Group two
is a large population ready to rely on a leader with confidence and the clarity to any
system. Group one could very well open a door or suggest an idea, or provide an
answer that group 2 may not have thought upon nor done so on their own as individual
units.
There is another aspect that goes along with power, money. While those who have
power may motivate others and steer them towards a particular decision, money will
also do the same. It plays a huge role and leads to the question, "Who owns
America's private government?". The answer seems almost obvious. Those with
money and power, make decisions on behalf of others. When doing so, it tends to
lead towards the resulting profit rather than "greatest good", as mentioned in our text,
The Politics of Power. Ultimately, everyone wants money and some want it to come
with control, but it seems that in some situations, the rich get richer while the poor r
remain poor and almost go poorer.
power. 2011. In Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary. Retrieved Feb2, 2011, from
http://www.Merriam-Webster.com/dictionary/power?show=0&t=1296695460
Katznelson, Ira, Mark Kesselman, and Alan Draper. The Politics of Power 5th ed.
Louisville:Transcontinental Printing, 2006. 35-49.
No comments:
Post a Comment